TY  - DATA
AU  - DragonAI Editorial Research Team
TI  - AI 搜索 RAG 与微调引用来源对比：千问、Kimi、Gemini 63 次公开观察 / AI Search Citation Sources for RAG vs. Fine-Tuning: 63 Public Qwen, Kimi, and Gemini Observations
PY  - 2026
DA  - 2026/07/22
PB  - 杭州烛龙智元科技有限公司
ET  - 1.1.0
LA  - Chinese
UR  - https://course.dragonai.tech/datasets/ai-search-citation-benchmark-snapshot-2026-07-22.json
AB  - Across five fixed unbranded-query batches, 45 runs produced 552 concrete citation-URL occurrences across 114 distinct hostnames. Concrete-URL coverage was 15/15 runs for Gemini, 14/15 for Qwen, and 2/15 for Kimi. DragonAI target citations and brand mentions were both zero, and the target was also absent from all ten strict unbranded Baidu observations. These frozen observations do not establish answer or source quality, index coverage, long-term preference, ranking causality, or GEO success.
KW  - 千问 Kimi Gemini
KW  - RAG 与微调
KW  - AI 搜索引用来源
KW  - generative engine optimization
KW  - AI search citations
N1  - Fixed-query run-level citation URL observations; no DOI has been issued
ER  -
